The evolution of autonomy

Stammers, Trevor (2015) The evolution of autonomy. The New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body, 21 (2). pp. 155-163. ISSN 2050-2877

[img]
Preview
Text
merged_document_3.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (569kB) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/2050287715Z.00000000070

Abstract

There can be little doubt, at least in the Western world, that autonomy is the ruling principle in contemporary bioethics. In spite of its ‘triumph’ however, the dominance of the utilitarian concept of autonomy is being increasingly questioned. In this paper, I explore the nature of autonomy, how it came to displace the Hippocratic tradition in medicine and how different concepts of autonomy have evolved. I argue that the reduction of autonomy to ‘the exercise of personal choice’ in medicine has led to a ‘tyranny of autonomy’ which can be inimical to ethical medical practice rather than conducive to it. I take the case of Kerrie Wooltorton as an illustration of how misplaced adherence to respect for patient autonomy can lead to tragic consequences. An analysis of autonomy based on the work of Rachel Haliburton is described and applied to the role of autonomy in a recent bioethical debate — that arising from Savulescu’s proposal that conscientious objection by health-care professionals should not be permitted in the NHS. In conclusion, I suggest Kukla’s concept of conscientious autonomy as one promising pathway to circumvent both the limitations and adverse effects of the dominance of current (mis)understandings of autonomy in biomedical ethics.

Item Type: Journal Article
School/Department: School of Education, Theology and Leadership
Depositing User: Trevor Stammers
Date Deposited: 09 Feb 2016 10:21
Last Modified: 02 Nov 2017 01:30
URI: http://research.stmarys.ac.uk/id/eprint/972

Altmetrics

If Altmetric statistics are available for this item, they will be visible below.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item
Downloads per month over past year